Thursday, May 30, 2019

Four Days at the World Health Assembly (continued) - Leveraging CHWs for UHC

As mentioned in my first series of updates, I attended an interesting side session to the WHA on CHWs and UHC organized by World Vision International (WVI). CORE's old friend, Tom Davis, facilitated the session. I'm too lazy to write all my notes about it, but I thought that one introductory presentation, in addition to being short [I'm a believer, but I'm not practicing] hit a lot of key points through the experience of WVI in different countries.

I'll try to have one more update on my time at WHA after that. But for now, I'm ceding the floor to Dan Irvine, Sr Director, Sustainable Health, WVI - here is his text with slides.
*****


The Universal Health Coverage goal today is presenting us a seemingly insurmountable challenge: 50% of the world’s population does not have access to health services; there is a current gap of 18 million healthcare workers.
Additionally, the UHC agenda is opening up a realm of health and well-being issues that historically have not been prioritized - issues like mental health, early child development, violence, sexual and reproductive health, non-communicable disease, and nutrition.  Our colleagues in the health system, and particularly at the front lines, are increasingly straining to effectively address these needs.

So who better to ensure that all people, everywhere, are reached with diverse health services than community health workers?  CHWs have always been at the heart of the Primary Health Care movement.  Since Alma Ata they have represented one of our strongest links between formal health systems and communities. 

We know today that CHWs are successful health agents when they are appropriately supported.  The WHO CHW guidance published last year, and the CHW resolution that will be passed in this 72nd world health assembly, are testaments to a new global confidence in the potential of CHWs, supported by an ample evidence base.  WHO notes that CHW platform support has been “uneven”, and in my experience that is certainly true.  World Vision frequently employs the CHW Assessment and Improvement Matrix to assess CHW program functionality, and we often identify sub-optimal support, for example in supportive supervision and incentive structures.

This has to change.  I believe one of the key messages of this session today is to advocate utilization of excellent available global CHW guidance, including the most recent WHO guidance, as well as many other important tools, some of which are listed on your handouts.  We should not be seeing today gaps in CHW platforms that have been identified consistently over the past years as marginalizing CHW results.  We have identified these challenges, we have developed guidance for implementers to address them – we all need to use the guidance, and shame on us if we don’t.

Now let’s talk a bit more about the next generation of CHWs…  In 2015 I directed a census of CHWs being supported by World Vision in 48 countries around the world.  One of the outcomes of our census that I found particularly intriguing was this analysis of the diverse activities they were engaging in – 25 activities in all.  As you consider the proportion of engagement in each activity, bear in mind that this is based on 220,000 CHWs we supported at the time.

You will note that amongst the activities many are closely aligned with core reproductive maternal, newborn child health and nutrition interventions.  But note also that nearly half of the programs state addressing early child development, 37% addressed adolescent health, and over half supported parenting groups. 

Over the last few years we have been exploring somewhat non-traditional roles for CHWs.  This month we are just concluding a study in four countries: Kenya, Tanzania, Myanmar and Bangladesh, on CHW address of violence against children.  This follows a study we published last year examining national policy alignment with the WHO Action Plan to Combat Violence, wherein we found some positive trends, but little policy implication for CHWs.


In the current study we interviewed 412 CHWs across these countries and have frankly been somewhat surprised to find that the majority already consider addressing violence against children as part of their role, they observe situations of violence in the household, and are actively intervening.  They also state a desire for capacity building to better address this violence.  With 1.7 billion children facing situations of interpersonal violence each year globally, World Vision will be testing how to best support CHWs to help them.

Last year we were thrilled to see publication of the Nurturing Care Framework for Early Childhood Development, which calls for an integrated approach towards the young child cohort inclusive of health, nutrition, water and sanitation, early stimulation, child protection and caregiving.  The framework suggests a critical role for the frontline health workforce in these objectives as this cadre most typically engages families in regards the well-being of young children.  In our experience, once again it is CHWs that present one of the best opportunities to support this multi-sector approach.

World Vision began integrating early child development interventions into core health CHW platforms many years back, and have worked with partners at Harvard, Aga Khan, Johns Ho

pkins and Al Quds universities to evaluate impact of the approach in a number of countries.  In this example in Palestine we found that inclusion of psychosocial first aid and early stimulation components resulted in significant gains across three standardized ECD scales, with positive effects for mothers as well as the children.

Time after time, whether it be diagnosis and treatment of infectious disease, treatment of severe acute malnutrition, or addressing violence and caregiving, we have seen that properly supported lay health workers can effectively extend service coverage.  In this case World Vision worked with WHO and the University of South Wales to test CHW delivery of a mental health intervention addressing distressed victims of gender-based violence in Kenya. 
The Problem Management Plus intervention involves facilitation of five behavioral treatment sessions with distressed women on an individual basis.  Our trial in Kenya demonstrated that the CHW facilitated approach outperformed the standard enhanced usual care approach.

Once again, Universal Health Coverage means that all people, everywhere, have affordable access to support for all issues affecting their physical and mental health and well-being.  If we are to realize this goal we must have a strong primary health care system, and I believe that CHWs are at the heart of that system.

Dan Irvine. 5/21/2019 [Dan_Irvine at WVI dot Org]

Monday, May 20, 2019

Four Days at the World Health Assembly (WHA) - Eric's Journal

Le Palais des Nations
I'm in Geneva for the next 3-4 days on behalf of Save the Children and CORE Group. I'll be speaking briefly at a PMNCH, CORE, CLAC (Citizen Led Accountability Coalition), and Save event on "The Role of Government in Welcoming the Voice of the People." I'll also be covering as many of the HSS, PHC, community health, and UHC-related sessions as I can.

I'm going to use this blog to journal and report along the way...

  • Monday, May 20, 2019 -- Geneva, First day at the WHA
Starting the way with the Save the Children pow-wow, colleagues from Advocacy and Humanitarian Response, from the UK, Germany, Australia, and of course Switzerland (kindly hosting us) so far...
Keywords: UHC - ACCOUNTABILITY & CIVIC SPACE
Very timely - our SCUK have just released a UHC AND ACCOUNTABILITY INDEX. This short document presents data for dozens of countries on prioritization of PHC, financing of UHC, and interestingly on general health financing accountability and civic engagement.

Interesting reminders: links between availability of skilled health workers, and government financial committment with  U5 mortality, and interesting observation (see the last figure) that "countries with higher U5 mortality rates are often countries with less civil space."

-> Read the blog: "is civic space the cornerstone of UHC?"
-> Download The Universal Health Coverage and Accountability Index

stay tuned...


The WHA is a whirlwind of official sessions, business sessions, technical updates, and side sessions. Here are a few that I caught...

  • Still Monday, May 20, 2019 -- PHC session (aka Primary Health Care towards Universal Health Coverage and Sustainable Development Goals, official side event)
Keywords: PHC - UHC - SDGs ... and CHWs!
This official side event was sponsored by China, Denmark, Ethiopia, Iran, etc. I got there five minutes early - that was insufficient to have a seat among those arranged along the wall, around the central space of tables for official delegations. Apart from standing, the downside of that was absence of access to an earpiece for translations. So, I may have missed some of the wisdom of the Chinese and Russian presentations.

The dominant style at the WHA, I quickly figured out, is the reading of written speeches. It makes sense, in a context where everything is recorded, and where speakers represent their nation-state (when they have one) that written text would dominate. But it was very different from my usual conference experience.

The opening of that session and speeches I could understand restated loudly essential principles:
- no UHC without PHC
- health systems as a foundation of PHC and UHC
- the historical trajectory from Alma Ata to Astana
- the emergence of the PHC operational framework, the SDG accelerator (largely among global public private partnerships - more on that later), and still the need to build the evidence base.

One speaker ended his speech with "in the name of PHC and UHC"; I felt compelled to say 'Amen', but I resisted. I'll take all the signs of commitment and buy-in for PHC that I can take.

The Minister of Health of Ethiopia re-explained the Ethiopian model for PHC and community health that most of us are familiar with now. Of note, he explained how a bridge was needed between CHWs and the households themselves, how women were the bridge, and how this had led to the Health Development Army, renamed Women Development Army for the occasion. Given that our 'Beyond the Building Blocks' paper is finally under press, and that it articulates that very need for what we sometimes describe as a 'dual model' (CHWs becoming professionals, CHVs grounded in community life, with rational task distribution), I was naturally elated by this reference.

Other speeches were made -- it was interesting to hear how PHC could be described as a key concern in countries as different as Singapore, Ethiopia, and Denmark! Key message here: PHC is not an LMIC strategy, it's a fundamental Public Health strategy.

Quote from my notes (I think from the Singapore representative): "The definition of PHC will vary country to country depending on epidemiology, ..."
.
-> Spoiler alert: over the next few days, WHA72 endorsed a number of statements and resolutions, notably on Community Health Workers for the delivery of PHC. This built on the work of many people, WHO's official guidelines, support from governments including the USG as a co-sponsor of the resolution, advocates, implementers from civil society to countries in the last 50 years.
This historical resolution is available here.

  • Monday, May 20, 2019 -- Second Plenary Session
Keywords: everything - non-state actor
The General Assembly Hall (from the Edge of my Seat)
I found my place as a non-state actor in the impressive plenary hall of the 'Palais des Nations', and I will not try to summarize it for you. There is a lot of process and protocol happening. OK, since you insist I'll give you key words: 'health of all humanity', '75 agenda items', 'responsive health systems providing quality care', 'no one left behind' (the theme), 'affordable, essential, quality health', a 'normative assembly', 'commitment', 're-commitment', 'walk the talk', 'health, environment, climate change', 'Astana', 'second chance', 'domestic resource mobilization', 'responsiveness to the most vulnerable populations'...


Dr Tedros
I'll skip over the debate about whether Taiwan should get its observer status back, which was rejected (China and Pakistan opposed, in spite of the Marshall Islands and St Vincent and the Grenadines strong plea), and whether there should be a side session on the health conditions in the occupied Palestinian Territories, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights, which took place a few days later (in spite of forceful objections by Israel and the United States of America).

Finally, we got to the speech by Dr Tedros. That was my primary target...
Unfortunately Dr Tedros explained that he had already made his speech during a morning plenary and wouldn't repeat himself. I haven't seen the text online yet, but

-> You can watch Dr Tedros' speech here.

And, no, I don't have a summary. Sorry.


I'll add more notes in the coming days, starting with a very interesting session by our friends from World Vision on CHWs, and "Committee A" sessions, where my Save the Children advocacy colleagues made key contributions, as well as FHWC, Impact Coalition, Intrahealth, and too many others to name...

Sorry to leave you on a cliffhanger. Stay tuned...